Between the Law of Designs and Patents: Wearable Technology

Authors

  • Ana Karin Chávez Valdivia Uinversidad La Salle. Arequipa-Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v12i41.2018.430

Keywords:

Industrial designs, unregistered designs, patents, copyrights, wearable technology, fashion.

Abstract

Intellectual Property is one of the most important assets that companies have. Although traditionally it has existed a clear difference between industrial designs and patents, due to the very nature of the design, there was a need to raise various possibilities to safeguard around this technological figure, whose development could lead us to question the current mechanisms of protection. Wearable technology is booming and involves an interaction of two sectors that are still a matter of analysis, discussion and lack of consensus: fashion and technology. We believe that the denaturalization of industrial design could occur in the face of the imminent possibility of acceptance of an omission of the form with a function that, added to the lack of clarity that exists regarding the protection of unregistered designs and the lack of regulations surrounding the design of wearable technology, that would lead us to a forced analysis on the relevance of application of current legal mechanisms in the technological field and the need to have regulations in line with existing technological innovations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ana Karin Chávez Valdivia, Uinversidad La Salle. Arequipa-Perú

Doctora en Derecho y Magister en Derecho de la Empresa. Especialista en Derecho Informático y Gobierno Electrónico. Abogada. Conciliadora Extrajudicial. Directora de Proyección Social y Difusión Cultura y Docente investigadora asociada a la Carrera de Derecho de la Universidad La Salle de Arequipa-Perú

References

U.S. Code § 171 - Patents for designs, Legal Information Institute.[Fecha de consulta 2 julio 2017]. Disponible enhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/171

“Acuerdo sobre los aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad Intelectual relacionados con el comercio”, WorldTradeOrganization. [Fecha de consulta 5 julio 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.wto.org/spanish/docs_s/legal_s/27-trips.pdf

“Convenio de Berna para la protección de las obras literarias y artísticas”, OMPI. [Fecha de consulta 2 julio 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.wipo.int/treaties/es/text.jsp?file_id=283698

“Convenio de Paris para la Protección de la Propiedad Industrial”, OMPI. [Fecha de consulta 2 julio 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/es/treaties/text.jsp?file_id=287557

“Copyright law of the United States”, Copyrigth.gov. [Fecha de consulta 10 julio 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf

Guillaume, E, Sociología de las Tendencias, Barcelona, Editorial Gustavo Gili, 2013.

Ley sobre el Derecho de Autor, Lima, 24 de abril del 1996, Diario Oficial El Peruano.

Poole, E, The Brave New World of Wearable Technology: What Implications for IP? Wipo Magazine [en linea]. 2014, Vol.3 [fecha de consulta 12 Julio 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2014/03/article_0002.html

Raustiala, K y Sprigman, C, The piracy paradox: innovation and intellectual property in fashion design, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, diciembre 2016, [Fecha de consulta 10 julio 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.law.virginia.edu/pdf/faculty/sprigman_piracy.pdf

Salas Pasuy, Brenda. La industria de la moda a la luz de la propiedad intelectual, La Propiedad Inmateria [En línea]. 2013, Vol. 17. [Fecha de consulta 1 julio 2017]. Disponible en:

http://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/3583/3800

Published

2018-01-23